| Welcome to The Latell
Report. The Report, analyzing Cuba's contemporary domestic and
foreign policy, is published monthly except August and December
and distributed by the electronic information service of the
Cuba Transition Project (CTP) at the University of Miami's Institute
for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies (ICCAS).
The Latell Report is a publication of ICCAS and
no government funding has been used in its publication. The
opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of ICCAS and/or the U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID).
Fidel Castro and Black Saturday
|
More has probably been written about the Cuban Missile Crisis
than any other episode of the Cold War. Dozens of histories,
memoirs, and scholarly tomes were thought to have squeezed
the story dry after forty-five years of examination. But in
a new book, One Minute to Midnight, Washington
Post reporter Michael Dobbs seizes on those tortured
thirteen days in October 1962 as no one has before.
Using interviews with American
and Russian veterans of the superpower confrontation, recently
declassified Kennedy-era documents, and obscure archival materials,
Dobbs has written a gripping day-by-day account of the crisis
that brought the world even closer to conflagration than previously
thought. Most of his story, and the most startling revelations,
are crowded into vivid descriptions of just two days late
in the crisis --October 26 and October 27, the latter known
as Black Saturday.
Jack and Bobby Kennedy are
depicted as more fallible, less heroic than their Camelot
mythologizers have portrayed them. Nikita Khrushchev, the
Soviet leader, comes across as more calculating and decisive
than had generally been believed. And Fidel Castro, though
often portrayed as merely a pawn in a superpower contest of
wills, was the long-term big winner. In terms of what was
at stake for him and his regime, he could not have done much
better.
Never mind that Castro raged
and sulked for many weeks after Khrushchev agreed to remove
the medium and intermediate range nuclear missiles he had
installed on the island. Fidel was humiliated when Khrushchev
failed even to inform him of the decision, learning how the
crisis was to end from an aide, Carlos Franqui, who had just
heard it announced by Soviet media.
Franqui asked Fidel, “what
should we do about this news?”
“What news?” Castro
retorted. And Franqui then read the news bulletin to him and,
as Dobbs writes, ”braced himself for an explosion.”
Castro went on to retaliate
with self-indulgent fury by defying the Americans, the Soviets,
and the United Nations by refusing to allow on-site inspections.
It would be more than another six months before he and his
patient patron Khrushchev finally began to get their relations
back to normal. At the time Castro did not appear to have
emerged victorious.
But as Dobbs writes, a little
over a year later Kennedy was dead, murdered by a Fair Play
for Cuba activist. And a year after that Khrushchev was gone
too, sacked by successors who deplored his handling of the
strategic showdown. Only Castro survived unscathed, in fact
stronger than ever, guaranteed in power by the no invasion
pledge Kennedy made to secure the removal of the missiles.
Khrushchev always insisted
he had placed the missiles in Cuba to defend the Cuban revolution
against American aggression. In his own colorful phrase, he
wanted above all to “protect the communist infant in
its crib.” Dobb’s account of the crisis, and of
the Kennedy brothers covert machinations to dethrone Castro
before, and even during the Missile Crisis, demonstrate how
central that motive was.
Ironically too, Castro’s
behavior on Black Saturday was decisive in causing Khrushchev
early in the Moscow morning of October 28 to cut his losses
and capitulate to Kennedy without achieving all of his key
objectives. A crucial consideration for the beleaguered Soviet
premier was his mounting concern that, as Dobbs notes, “Soviet
commanders in Cuba were following Castro’s orders”
and not those of their own commanders. An American U-2 reconnaissance
aircraft had been shot down by a Soviet surface-to-air missile
(SAM) late in the morning on Black Saturday and its pilot
killed. Two missiles were fired from a battery near Banes,
in eastern Cuba, the town where Fidel Castro had been married
almost exactly fourteen years earlier.
Dobbs, however, does not give
Fidel sufficient credit for this first precipitously hostile
act of the crisis. Castro himself told participants in a conference
about the crisis in Havana in 1992 that “it’s
still a mystery what led the Soviet (SAM base commander) .
. . to issue the order to open fire. . . we couldn’t
give them any orders, but we cannot say they were solely responsible.
“ He meant that when he gave the orders the same morning
to Cuban anti-aircraft batteries to open fire on low-flying
American aircraft conducting reconnaissance and harassment
sorties across the island, Soviet personnel were energized
to follow suit. Khrushchev’s concern about his own generals
losing control of their subordinates was not a fantasy. Castro
told the 1992 conference:
“These soldiers were
all together. They had a common enemy. The firing started,
and in basic spirit of solidarity, the Soviets decided to
fire as well . . . I can add that Khrushchev for some time
believed that we had shot down the (U-2) plane.”
It was also early in the morning
on Black Saturday that Castro composed what has been described
as his Armageddon letter. Perhaps the most contemptible document
produced anywhere and at any time during the nuclear age,
Castro’s letter to Khrushchev recommended that a preemptive
Soviet nuclear attack be launched against the United States
if Cuba were attacked. Castro wrote:
“I say this because the
imperialists’ aggressiveness has become extremely dangerous,
and if they do indeed perform an act so brutal . . . that
would be the moment to eliminate that danger forever, in an
act of the most legitimate self-defense. However hard and
terrible the solution might be, there is no other."
The existence of the letter
was not revealed until 1989, by Khrushchev’s son Sergei.
Furious denials by Soviet and Cuban authorities followed.
But after the third volume of Nikita Khrushchev’s memoirs
was published the following year, in which he discussed the
letter, Cuban authorities reluctantly released the text. Castro
ever since has done his best to put his own spin on what he
wrote. But nothing he ever contemplated or resorted to through
his long and violent revolutionary career even remotely compared
to the barbarity of that apocalyptic message to Khrushchev.
______________________________
Dr. Brian Latell, distinguished Cuba analyst
and recent author of the book, After Fidel: The Inside
Story of Castro’s Regime and Cuba’s Next Leader,
is a Senior Research Associate at ICCAS. He has informed American
and foreign presidents, cabinet members, and legislators about
Cuba and Fidel Castro in a number of capacities. He served
in the early 1990s as National Intelligence Officer for Latin
America at the Central Intelligence Agency and taught at Georgetown
University for a quarter century. Dr. Latell has written,
lectured, and consulted extensively.
________________________________
The CTP, funded by a grant
from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),
can be contacted at P.O. Box 248174, Coral Gables, Florida 33124-3010,
Tel: 305-284-CUBA (2822), Fax: 305-284-4875, and by email at
ctp.iccas@miami.edu.
| . |